Legal Opinion

Love v. Ardmore Stock Exchange

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided October 19, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District. Hosea Townsend, Judge. Action by L. H. Love against the Ardmore Stock Exchange and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District. Hosea Townsend, Judge. Action by L. H. Love against the Ardmore Stock Exchange and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. January 23, 1899, appellant, L. H. Love, began his action for debt, and filed in the office of the United States commissioner, Southern District, at Ardmore, complaint and affidavit for attachment against the Ardmore Stock Exchange, without alleging whether defendant was a corporation or a partnership. Attachment bond, in due form on same day was also filed and approved February 2, 1899, the…

1Opinion of the CourtGill, J.

Appellant makes the third and last assignment of error in his motion for new trial as his specification of error *207relied on in this court. The case was tried in the court below without the intervention of a jury, and.the court made its certain specified findings of fact from the testimony, and, among them, it found that the check which John S. O'Mealy gave to the inter-pleader on the garnishee bank was coupled with an agreement between said O'Mealy and the interpleader that the money in bank, and to be deposited therein, was for the benefit of the interpleader, and that, taken with all the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Laclede Bank v. SchulerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Florence Mining Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Poland v. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  2. Poland v. LoveCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API