Legal Opinion

Poland v. Love

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided June 14, 1907Published

Error to the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory; before Justice Townsend, June 28, 1905. Action by L. H. Love against the Ardmore Stock Exchange, in which W. P. Poland interpleaded. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and interpleader brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Clayton, J,

This is a suit brought by defendant in error as plaintiff against the Ardmore Stock Exchange. The plaintiff in error, W. P. Poland, was an interpleader in that cáse. The defendant, the Ardmore Stock Exchange, has not 'appealed. The case was .tmcl to the court; -a jury having-been waived by the parties. As the defendant has not appealed, it is not necessary to state the facts arising on the issues between the plaintiff and defendant' further than to state that the suit was on an account. An attachment was sued out, and writ of garnishment served on the First National Bank of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Love v. Ardmore Stock ExchangeCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API