Legal Opinion

Herr v. McCORMICK GRAIN-THE HEIMAN COMPANY, INC.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 19, 1994No. 92-1321-PFKPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATRICK F. KELLY, Chief Judge.

Samuel E. Herr filed suit against the defendants, McCormick Grain — The Heiman Company, Inc. (McCormick Grain) and James L. Heiman (Heiman), claiming “unpaid and wrongfully withheld wages” and overtime compensation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the Kansas Wage Payment Act (KWPA), K.SA. § 44-313 et seq.; seeking recovery of benefits under two McCormick Grain pension plans pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.; and requesting cancellation…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API