Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Clark
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to St. Clair. (Stevens, J.) Appeal from judgment of commissioner in summary proceedings. Case under the statute. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Plaintiff commenced proceedings before a circuit court commissioner, by a complaint made by John *176M. Hoffman in behalf of plaintiff, alleging that the defendant was then in the possession of lands and premises situated in the township of Fort Gratiot, in St. Clair county, described as follows:
“The south half of the south half of Fishery No. 1, so-called ; said Fishery No. 1 being more particularly described as commencing at the north line of the light-house reserve, and extending 120 rods north of the north line of the McNeil tract, so called, including the land lying between the lake road and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blanchard v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Fuller v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Vos v. DykemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Byrne v. BeesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1843
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cadwallader v. LoveceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Tefft v. TefftMichigan Supreme Court · 1908