Legal Opinion

Young v. Struhl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 13, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1007The moving defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the issue of the statute of limitations (see CPLR 214-a; Zito v Jastremski, 58 AD3d 724, 726 [2009]; Vaughn v City of New York, 4 AD3d 412, 414 [2004]; Denlea v Hanswirth, 303 AD2d 711, 712 [2003]). Moreover, although the moving defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the affidavit of two experts who opined, inter alia, that the moving defendants did not deviate from accepted standards of care in their treatment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colao v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Martin v. SiegenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Howard v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Vaughn v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Zito v. JastremskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API