Legal Opinion

Central National-Gottesman, Inc. v. Rodman & Rodman, P.C.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 30, 1998No. 974791Published

1Opinion of the CourtZobel, J.

The question is whether a statute partly abrogating the common-law rule against survival of actions, G.L.c. 228, §1, bars claims for negligence, fraud, indemnification triggered by wrongful conduct, and unfair and deceptive acts, G.L.c. 93A.

Plaintiffs here sold material on credit to Foremost Printing Office Service, Inc. (“Foremost”), whose accountant, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, Rodman & Rodman, P.C. (“Rodman”), prepared financial statements which Plaintiffs allege contained misrepresentations on which they relied to their loss.

Jack L. Badler (“Badler”), Foremost’s CEO and CFO, resigned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Glickman v. BrownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Nycal Corp. v. KPMG Peat Marwick LLPMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Piper v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. McStowe v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Putnam v. SavageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API