Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Bank of Clear Creek County

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Arapahoe County. On motion to dismiss appeal.

1Per curiam

This matter comes before the court on motion to dismiss the appeal very much out of the usual course and according to a practice which has seldom been resorted to in the state. The procedure commends itself to our judgment. That the practice may be thoroughly settled, we are inclined to express our views respecting it.

This was a proceeding in forcible entry and detainer, wherein the county court rendered a judgment and decree on the 18th day of November, 1895. The defendants filed a motion for a new trial, and, on the date of the entry of the judgment, the court ordered the execution to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Thomas & Co. v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Clark v. HancockSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Burchinell v. BennettColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Burchinell v. BennettColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API