Legal Opinion

Maryland State Fair, Inc. v. Schmidt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 26, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

Being seised ias tenants by the entireties of a tract of land, containing about one hundred and twenty-two acres, in Anne Arundel County, near the present location of the Laurel race track, Adolph. Schmidt and Louisa his wife, on July 24th, 1888, joined in a deed conveying it to* Louisa Schmidt, the wife, in trust to hold, use, occupy, and enjoy it during her life upon.the payment of taxes, and at her death, upon their payment of certain ‘Charges aggregating nine hundred dollars against the property, the grantors conveyed the home and ten acres surrounding it to Kate Schmidt, wife of Jonah…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas Roberts & Co. v. BonaparteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  2. Zittle v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  3. Brown v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  4. Chesapeake Brewing Co. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  5. Buchanan's Lessee v. SteuartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1813

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. County Commissioners of Charles County v. ST. CHARLES ASSOCIATES LTD.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Hodges v. OwingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  3. Bright v. Lake Linganore Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Neavitt v. LightnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API