Roberts v. Converse
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Roger Mills County; Action brought by R. V. Converse in a justice of the peace court against C. C. Roberts, Jr., and another. Erom an order of the county court dismissing an appeal by defendants, they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HARRISON, C.
R. V. Converse recovered a judgment in the justice court against C. C. Roberts and Charles Watkins, who appealed to the county court. The county court held the appeal bond insufficient, refused to. allow an amendment thereof, and dismissed tifié appeal. From such order- the: cause is brought here. The defect in the appeal' bond in question was that it did not embody' in specific language the condition “that appellant would prosecute his appeal to effect and without unnecessary delay.” But it did give the proper style of the case, the court from which the appeal was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Harper v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Roberts v. ConverseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cook v. RedfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Magerus v. DossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940