Rolane Sportswear, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McCREE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court, entered after a trial without a jury, holding that appellees, four insurance companies, had fully discharged their respective liabilities *1093to appellant, Rolane Sportswear, Inc., by-paying into court the sum of $110,096.-12.
The facts as found by the District Court are adopted. On March 30, 1965, certain fabrics owned by appellant were damaged or destroyed by fire in a factory in Ridgely, Tennessee, where they were being processed into wearing apparel. It was agreed by all parties that the value of the damaged, goods…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Pollock v. German Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Moore v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rolane Sportswear, Incorporated v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969