Legal Opinion

Kolbe v. Projects & Joint Ventures International, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: A party opposing a motion for summary judgment must produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to require a trial of material questions of fact on which he rests his claim (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). Defendant has failed to sustain its burden. Defendant’s allegations regarding an alleged oral agreement with Charles R. Will, Jr., do not constitute proof in admissible form. Oral declarations or secret agreements between a mortgagor and an assigning mortgagee made prior to *989the assignment are inadmissible…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Sleeth v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Merkle v. . BeidlemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henness v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Pacesetter Motors, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  3. Bayside 45th Drive Corp. v. MugalliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API