Legal Opinion

International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Diaz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 23, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

• Appeal from Bexar County Court for Civil Cases; Geo. W. Huntress, Judge. Action by Joe Diaz against the International & Great Northern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPly, C. J.

Appellee sought the recovery of damages from appellant resulting from the death of a certain mule, which came to its end by being struck by a moving locomotive, operated on the track of appellant in the city of San Antonio. The grounds of negligence were a failure to reduce the speed of the train to 10 miles an hour in obedience to an ordinance of said city, a failure to ring a bell or blow a whistle at street crossings, and a failure to exercise ordinary diligence in discovering said mule on the track, and, if they did discover it, a failure to stop the train. A claim was made for $225, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. WatkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. SympkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. City National Bank of Fort Worth v. StoutTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Umscheid v. ScholzTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. BroomheadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. WhisenantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Celaya v. City of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Harlan v. Falfurrias Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Garrett v. Cuero Mill & Feed Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API