John V. Farwell Co. v. Matheis
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
At Law. Action by the John V. Farwell Company against John Matheis, and Theodore Draz, garnishee. On motion to discharge the garnishee.
1Opinion of the CourtKelson, J.
The defendant, Matheis, made an assignment- under the insolvent laws of the state of Minnesota to Theodore Draz, assignee. The plaintiff seeks to reach by garnishment proceedings the property held under the assignment; and the assignee, setting, up the facts of the assignment, and the possession of the property, and presenting the deed *364thereof, asks to be discharged. It is claimed that the deed of assignment is void for the reason, among others, that chapter .30, Laws Minn. 1889, authorizing a statutory assignment, never became a law, and ought not to be in the statute book. It appears from…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Putnam v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Ralls v. WyandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- United States v. DietrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1904
- Shaw v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Bruce v. PopeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917