Beatty v. Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of a temporary receiver of the real property at 11-13 East Utica Street in Buffalo. Plaintiff met his burden of demonstrating that he has an "apparent interest” in the property (CPLR 6401 [a]; see, Nelson v Nelson, 99 AD2d 917) and establishing by clear and convincing evidence that there was a likelihood "of irreparable loss or damage” if a receiver were not appointed (Groh v Halloran, 86 AD2d 30, 33; see, Lefebvre v Shea, 212 AD2d 884, 885;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Nelson v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Groh v. HalloranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Serdaroglu v. SerdarogluAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Somerville House Management, Ltd. v. American Television Syndication Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Singh v. Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Beatty v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Beatty v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Michelle H. v. Buffalo Edge, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- US Income Partners, LLC v. Cypress Pointe FL Holdings, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.