Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Associated Scaffolders & Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 2003No. COA02-397PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

The factual background of this case is summarized in the companion case Jackson v. Associated Scaffolders et al, 152 N.C. App. 687, 568 S.E.2d 666 (2002) (the Jackson case).

In the rental contract between Associated Scaffolders and Equipment Company, Inc. (Associated) and defendant (Comfort), Associated included a provision intended to secure indemnification from Comfort in case of any negligence or equipment failure, excepting only willful misconduct. The relevant provision states:

INDEMNIFICATION: LESSEE SHALL INDEMNIFY AND DEFEND LESSOR AGAINST AND HOLD LESSOR HARMLESS FROM ANY…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Bruce-Terminix Company v. Zurich Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Duke University v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pulte Home Corp. v. American Southern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Production Systems, Inc. v. Amerisure InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Republic Western InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
  4. Hobbs Realty & Construction Co. v. Scottsdale InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API