Legal Opinion
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Tas
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ira Gammerman, J.
Defendant Pamukbank Tas (Pamukbank), a Turkish bank, moves for an order: (1) dismissing the complaint, on the grounds of comity, or, alternatively, on the ground of forum non conveniens, (2) annulling this court’s prior order of attachment, and (3) awarding costs and damages to defendant, including attorneys’ fees, sustained by reason of the attachment.
Plaintiff Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) opposes defendant’s motion and cross-moves for an order granting summary judgment in its favor on the complaint.
Metalsac Ticaret Ve Sanayi Ltd. (Metalsac),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. PahlaviNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Greschler v. GreschlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- J. Zeevi & Sons, Ltd. v. Grindlays BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- First Commercial Bank v. Gotham Originals, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. v. ICICI Bank Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- 3Com Corp. v. Banco De Brasil, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Administratia Asigurarilor De StatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Cantrade Privatbank AG. Zürich v. Bangkok Bank Public Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- ITM Enterprises, Inc. v. Bank of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003