Mubarak v. California Department of Corrections
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER: (1) ADOPTING-IN-PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; AND (3) DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
SABRAW, District Judge.
Currently pending before this Court is a motion by Defendants to dismiss Plaintiff Mubarak Mubarak’s Third Amended Complaint, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b). Because Plaintiff is a state prisoner bringing claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1997 (“PLRA”), applies to this case. The Court holds that the PLRA requires “total exhaustion” of administrative remedies…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Edward McKeever Jr. v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- McKinney v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nichols v. LoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- Lewis v. MitchellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Ornelas v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005