Legal Opinion
Velander v. Garner
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 5, 2003No. 02-1366; Interference No. 104,242PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL, in which Circuit Judge PROST joins. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA.
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal stems from an interference proceeding involving the claims of United States Patent Application Serial No. 08/443,184 (the “'184 application”) and United States Patent No. 5,639,940 (the “'940 patent”). William H. Velander, William N. Drohan, Henryk Lubon (deceased), and John L. Johnson (deceased) (collectively “Velander”) are the inventors named on the '184 application. Ian Garner, Donna E. Prunkard, and Donald C. Foster…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Twi Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- In Re American Academy of Science Tech CenterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.