Legal Opinion

Ribble v. Burnham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket No. 88, Calendar No. 35,227PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff owns and is in possession of a house and lot facing west on Territorial road in unplatted portion of village of Metamora. The defendants own and possess a house and lot just north of plaintiff’s property. Between the two properties is a disputed strip 50 feet in width. Plaintiff alleges that he owns it and has had possession of it for many years: Defendants assert that the strip is a public highway and claim no right in it “except as a citizen.” Plaintiff filed this bill to enjoin repeated-trespasses by defendants, and for other relief. Plaintiff had decree. Defendants have appealed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. South Branch Ranch Co. v. EmeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Murphey v. Township of LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Diamond Match Co. v. Village of OntonagonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bain v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Pulleyblank v. Mason County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API