DeLaigle v. Shuptrine
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from Toombs superior court — Judge Hardeman. May 21, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
It is the contention of plaintiffs in error that, since it was the law prior to the statute relative to the record of conditional sales reserving title, embodied in sections 3318 and 3319 of the Civil Code (1910), that a reservation of title did not need to be recorded in order to bind third parties (Goodwin v. May, 23 Ga. 205); and that, since the statute referred to has reference only to conditional sales, and not to any such provision and agreement in a rent contract as that referred to, such an agreement, not being a contract of conditional sale, is not required to be recorded under the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holmes v. Pye & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Thornton v. CarverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Worrill v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Ashmore v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Goodwin v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elder v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Kirkland v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- In re Lathrop Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1933