Legal Opinion

Kirkland v. Wallace

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 22, 1922No. 13255PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. While it is true that where the relation of landlord and tenant exists, “ so far as the general and special statutory liens in favor of the landlord go, a- bona fide purchaser without notice of a crop grown on rented premises is protected” (DeLaigle v. Shuptrine, 28 Ga. App. 380, 110 S. E. 920, 921; Collins v. Harrison, 24 Ga. App. 404, 100 S. E. 794), yet where the relation is that of landlord and cropper, as the title to the crops under the statute remains in the landlord until actual division and settlement (Civil Code of 1910, §§ 3705, 3707; Williams v. Mitchem, 151 Ga. 227, 106 S. E.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sappington v. RimesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Deloach v. DelkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Williams v. MitchemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Collins v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. DeLaigle v. ShuptrineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Franklin v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. First National Bank of Harvey v. Woodworth Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API