Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Minley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1985Published

1Dissent

Green, J. (dissenting).

I must dissent. The People cannot rely on attenuation because there was no independent source for the evidence seized and no significant intervening event which could support a conclusion that the evidence was not the product of the illegal activity (People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527, cert denied 454 US 898). Not only was defendant coercively ordered out of his house, which was surrounded by five police cars and eight police officers, the police also continued their flagrant misconduct by falsely telling the defendant that he had been identified by one of the victims of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API