Annis v. Georgia Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The petition alleges that the motorman saw or could have seen that the driver was unconscious and was not controlling the automobile, but this was not to charge that the motorman knew or should have known of the helpless condition of the driver in time to avoid a collision by the exercise of proper care. The duty imposed by law upon the defendant and its servants to exercise ordinary care to avoid in*758jury to persons or property upon its tracks did not require that the motorman Should keep on the lookout to observe any sudden change in the physical condition…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Mayor of Macon v. DykesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Platt v. Southern Photo Material Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Gillespie v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Thomas v. Georgia Granite Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Freeman v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Southern Railway Company v. CabeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Freeman v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.