Legal Opinion

Farmer's Irrigation Co. v. Kamm

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1913No. 7824PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Garfield District Court. — Hon. John T. Shumate,' Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Musser

By this writ of error it is sought to review a judgment of the district court, decreeing a mechanic’s lien upon the ditch and reservoir of plaintiff in error. The evidence is not incorporated into the record. The defendant in error claimed a lien on account of materials furnished to one Harris, a subcontractor. That the materials were furnished is not denied. The only questiou raised is the validity of the lien. The plaintiff in error claims that its validity sufficiently appears from the record proper. The question as presented to this court, therefore, is a demurrer to the complaint upon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ward v. . KilpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Tsutakawa v. KumamotoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Armour & Co. v. Western Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Valley Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. NickersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  5. First Nat'l Bank of Bridgeport v. Perris Irrigation Dist.California Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Bushman Construction Company v. Air Force Academy Housing, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Brannan Sand & Gravel Co. v. Santa Fe Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  4. American Fac. Assoc., Ltd. v. Triangle Heat. & Sm Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Plateau Supply Co. v. Bison Meadows Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API