Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Jameson Bros.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 21, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of Bosque. Tried below before Hon. Wm. Poindexter.
1Opinion of the Court
SPBEB, Associate Justice.
The sole question presented upon this appeal is the sufficiency of appellees’ pleadings as against a general exception. The action is one to recover upon a contract of fire insurance, and the' point here raised is, that appellees’ petition nowhere specifically alleged that they were the owners of the property insured, or that they had any insurable interest therein. The contention of appellant finds some support in the decisions.
In German Insurance Co. v. Everett, 36 S. W. Rep., 125, it was said: “The appellee’s interest in the property covered by the policies at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Quarrier v. Peabody Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
- Northwestern National Insurance v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Rising Sun Insurance v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Fowler v. . the New York Indemnity Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- German Insurance v. I. M. Pearlstone & SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Missouri State Life Ins. v. RhyneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Continental Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. WallesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Royal Ins. Co. v. W. P. Wright & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Cisco & N. E. Ry. Co. v. DiefenderferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928