Hines v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLS, Chief Judge.
By this appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence for the offense of aggravated assault, Defendant, relying upon Section 918.09, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., contends that reversible error occurred during the trial of the cause when the prosecuting attorney interrogated him about his failure to testify at the preliminary hearing. We find that Defendant’s point is well taken.
Material excerpts of Defendant’s testimony on cross examination are:
“Q Well, did you attend a JP hearing on this particular case?
“A I did.
“Q And were you represented there by Mr. Jackson, your…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Raffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Hathaway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Peel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Andullerro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Hardee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972