Bennett v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Bullock, J.:
Prior to the dates material in this controversy, the life of Michael G. Bennett was insured by Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company under a policy of insurance Michael obtained through his employer. Peggy Bennett, plaintiff below, was designated beneficiary of Michael’s insurance policy. The premiums for this insurance were paid by Michael’s employer under a payroll deduction plan. The entire premium was deducted from Michael’s wages, the employer contributing nothing.
On or about August 24, 1977, Michael communicated to his employer his desire to cancel his insurance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. Metropolitan InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Miller v. the Travelers Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Riddle v. RankinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Johnson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Shunga Plaza, Inc. v. American Employers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yvonne Nicolson v. Life Insurance Company of the SouthwestCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Coe v. Farmers New World Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Sapp v. GreifDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Reddick v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Barnett v. Life Insurance Investors Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.