Legal Opinion

Kupka v. Dickson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1967No. 39120PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Frank Kupka, the plaintiff (respondent), and against the defendants (appellants), David J. Dickson and the marital community of Dickson and his wife, hereafter referred to in the singular, for moneys due under an asserted real estate contract.

Kupka and the defendant owned adjoining pieces of property in the city of Tacoma in an area within the boundaries of the city’s Center Street Urban Renewal Proj*218ect. They were aware that there was a good possibility their properties might be acquired or condemned by the city. A contract dated July 26, 1963 was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Underwood v. SternerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Baker v. MurreyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  2. Daily v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Daniels v. AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Daniels v. AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API