Legal Opinion

Goldstein, Goldman, Kessler & Underberg v. 4000 East River Road Associates

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1979PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (64 AD2d 484).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Judges Gabrielli and Meyer dissent and vote to reverse for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Richard J. Card amone at the Appellate Division (64 AD2d, at pp 489-491). \

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldstein v. 4000 East River Road AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Matter of Petition of Rosenman & Colin, Appellee-Cross-Appellant, for an Adjudication of Its Rights in the Matter of Sherrier v. Richard. Rosenman & Colin, Cross-Appellant, Julian Sherrier v. Bernice Richard, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Kaplan v. ReussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Indosuez v. Sopwith Holdings Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Rosenman & Colin v. RichardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Golden v. WhittemoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API