Legal Opinion
Menne v. Celotex Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 28, 1986No. 85-1929-KPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATRICK F. KELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Donald R. Menne brought this action against defendants Celotex, EaglePicher Industries, Fibreboard, Keene Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., and Ray-mark, Inc. to recover damages sustained as a consequence of certain personal injuries suffered from excessive exposure to asbestos dust and fibers, inhaled at his work place. He claimed that asbestos was a known hazardous substance and excessive exposure to it caused his condition.
Plaintiff further claimed that while working as a pipefitter during the years 1942-1948 at the Puget…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Menne v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Goldman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Mullen v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Poole v. Alpha Therapeutic Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Wysocki v. ReedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.