Robison v. Pease
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Monroe Circuit Court; W. H. Martin, Judge. Action by Horace S. Pease against Mary C. Robison and others on a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.
The appellee’saction was founded upon a promissory note for $300, executed to him by appellants on January 24, 1898, at Bloomington, Indiana, and payable at a bank in said town one year after date. The appellant, Mary C. Robison, defends upon the ground that she was and is a married woman and executed said note as surety for and to secure a debt of one Borgman.
The appellee on June 10, 1897, lived at Cincinnati, Ohio. Borgman, a son-in-law of appellants, was taking an agency of some kind from him and gave a bond conditioned to collect and pay over moneys received by him in such capacity. He…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Milliken v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Cochran v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Armstrong, Cator & Co. v. BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Bell v. PackardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.