United Accounts, Incorporated v. Dachtler
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUTZ, Judge.
Judgment in this action was entered by stipulation of the parties. Thereafter, the plaintiff garnisheed Grant County, as the employer of the defendant, in attempting to collect its judgment. In such garnishment proceeding the defendant contended that Grant County, being a political subdivision of the State of North Dakota, is not subject to garnishment and that property or funds in the hands of the garnishee County, belonging to the defendant, were not liable to garnishment.
The sole question on this appeal is whether a county is subject to garnishment as a garnishee.
In the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Harding v. City of DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Chambers County v. Lee CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- State Ex Rel. Wilson v. WeirMontana Supreme Court · 1938
- The People v. Bank of ChebanseIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dornacker v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. Burleigh County Housing AuthorityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Brown v. Burleigh County Housing AuthorityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013