Colman v. Macha
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice West are of the opinion that the *530judgment rendered by the trial court to which the writ of error is addressed should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Browne and Mr. Justice Terrell are of the opinion that said judgment should be reversed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Hampton v. McClungSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Griffith v. AlcockeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Pensacola Electric Co. v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Quigg v. RadelSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dale v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1925