Legal Opinion

Tabas v. Tabas

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 13, 1995No. 92-1495, 92-1529UnknownCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

In this action, brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), Pub.L. 91-452, Title IX, 84 Stat. 941, as amended, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961— 1968, we are presented with the question whether defendants’ acts, as alleged, constituted a “pattern of racketeering activity.” Specifically, we must determine what showing is required for plaintiffs to meet the “continuity” prong of RICO’s “pattern” requirement. Because we find that plaintiffs have alleged a series of acts sufficient to satisfy RICO’s continuity requirement, we will…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tabas v. TabasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Dominick Annulli v. Ananda K. PanikkarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. CC FORD GROUP, LLC v. JOHNSONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  4. George Henry Whaley Jr. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. KATZ v. DELUCADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API