Legal Opinion

In re the Contested Election of November 3, 1903

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ORIGINAL.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

This is a proceeding to contest the election for officers of the County of Oahu held on the third day of November—the first *326•election under Act 31 of tbe Laws of 1903, commonly known sis tbe County Act. One of tbe respondents demurred and most •of tbe others filed pleas to tbe jurisdiction of tbis court. Tbe remainder were given leave to answer if tbe jurisdiction of tbe •court should be sustained.

The laws on tbe subject of elections in tbis Territory are in general: (1) tbe provisions of tbe Organic Act upon that subject; (2) tbe rules and regulations for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myer v. Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Harris v. CooperHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Wheeler v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spears v. HondaHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. WillburnHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Smithies v. ConklingHawaii Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Territory v. Ah Fook YoungHawaii Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Kanealii v. HardyHawaii Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API