Daggett, Bassett & Hills Co. v. McClintock
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Menominee. (Grant, J.) Garnishment proceeding. The garnishees bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
On the 12th of February, 1883, plaintiff, having commenced a suit on contract in the Menominee circuit court against McClintock, filed affidavit in garnishment against Smith & Loughrey as having property etc. of Mc-Olintock in their possession. March 6,1883, they disclosed that they held certain property under chattel mortgage for $4775.75 from McClintock, and some securities for the same debt, and had nothing else. Judgment being recovered against the principal defendant for $564.05, the garnishees were held under the charge of the court for this amount. This judgment was rendered in August,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Worthington v. HannaMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Brink v. FreoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Haynes v. LeppigMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- King v. HubbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Bayne v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Meigs v. WellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Wood v. EldredgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Rall v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.