Legal Opinion

Ritzinger v. Delaware County Commissioners

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1963No. Appeal, No. 251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodsibe, J.,

This case involves the disposition of funds realized by the county through a redemption of real estate by the plaintiff after it had been sold by the County Commissioners, who had purchased it at a tax sale.

The legal steps by which the disputed fund came into existence are taken from the plaintiff’s complaint. We set them forth along with the citations of the statutory law relating to each step.

A parcel of real estate in the Borough of Foleroft was sold October 8, 1952 by the Treasurer of Delaware County for the nonpayment of the 1950 real estate taxes. See Act of May…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zerbe Township School District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Frailey Township School District v. Schuylkill Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Erie AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Bernitsky v. Schuylkill CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Clark v. Roosevelt Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Bissell v. College Development Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API