Legal Opinion

Arizona Board of Regents v. Doe

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 27, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01638Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Arizona Board of Regents, No. CV-20-01638-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 John Doe, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On August 24, 2020, Defendant John Doe, who is proceeding pro se, filed an answer 16 to Plaintiff Arizona Board of Regents’ (“ABOR”) complaint. (Doc. 13.) Doe also filed a 17 motion to allow electronic filing by an unrepresented party. (Doc. 15.) For the following 18 reasons, Doe’s answer will be stricken, Doe’s motion to allow electronic filing will be 19 denied without prejudice, and Doe…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API