Legal Opinion

Dang v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2010No. H033425PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*650Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

Plaintiff Sheny Dang brought this action for legal malpractice against her former attorneys, defendants Alan Smith and Dennis P. Howell, and their firm, Grunsky, Ebey, Farrar & Howell, that had represented plaintiff in obtaining and attempting to collect a judgment against two men who purchased a bakery business from her and then defaulted. As initially framed, her complaint was largely predicated on defendants’ failure to record a judgment lien against real property in which one of the judgment debtors held an interest as a joint tenant. Defendants moved for summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Viner v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Distefano v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Pianka v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Stueve Bros. Farms v. Berger KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Regents of the UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. In re ObedianUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2016
  5. Civic Partners Stockton v. YoussefiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API