Legal Opinion · Dissent

Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 16-534 Re: Dana Marie Santino

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 19, 2018No. SC17-362Published

1Dissent

Attachment *48*49*50*51POLSTON, J., dissenting.

In this matter involving serious campaign misrepresentations in violation of the Florida Code of Judicial Conduct, I would impose a very severe discipline of a 90-day suspension without pay, a $50,000 fine plus the cost of these proceedings, and a public reprimand. However, unlike the majority, I would not follow the JQC's recommendation of removal because removal *52is not consistent with our precedent involving this type of serious campaign misconduct. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

I. BACKGROUND

On March 6, 2017, the Investigative Panel of the JQC…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Inquiry Concerning DaveySupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. In Re KinseySupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. In Re GrazianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. In Re McMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. In Re RenkeSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API