Legal Opinion

In Re Kinsey

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 30, 2003No. SC96629PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

842 So.2d 77 (2003)

Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 99-09, re Patricia KINSEY.

No. SC96629.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 30, 2003.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 2003.

The Honorable Harvey L. Goldstein, Chairman, Hearing Panel, Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission and John R. Beranek, Counsel to the Hearing Panel, Tallahassee, FL; Thomas C. MacDonald, Jr., General Counsel, Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, Marvin E. Barkin and Michael K. Green of Trenam, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye, O'Neill & Mullis, Special Counsel and Lansing C. Scriven, Co-Special Counsel, Tampa, FL, for…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lewis; Concurrence · Pariente; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lewis; Dissent; Concurrence · Quince.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Brown v. HartlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Ernest N. Morial v. Judiciary Commission of the State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. In Re RenkeSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. In Re DiazSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. In Re AndrewsSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Florida Family Policy Council v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API