Legal Opinion

Innes v. Stewart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1877PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Kent Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, J:

Innes filed his bill to restrain a suit on a bond for an *286alleged deficiency after a mortgage foreclosure, the sale having been made in April and confirmed in June, 1864, and the suit complained of having been begun in 1874. The bill claims the debt was paid by the sale, and also that ■whether technically paid or not, the circumstances were such .as to operate the same result, by the interference of interested parties in preventing bidders from appearing.

No leave was granted by the circuit court of Kent county, where the foreclosure was had, to sue on the bond, which was necessary…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walker v. GoldsmithOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. First National Bank of Salt Lake City v. HaymondUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Bickford v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  4. Culver v. Judge of the Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Island Savings Bank v. GalvinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API