Legal Opinion
State v. Woodbridge
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 2003No. 02 CA 60PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Waite, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas entered after appellant, Adam N. Woodbridge, pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in crack cocaine. Appellant also entered no contest pleas to charges of participating in a criminal gang under R.C. 2923.42(A)(B) and to a specification seeking the forfeiture of a 1993 GM Yukon truck, VIN # 1GEK18K6PJ349011.
{¶ 2} Appellant argues that R.C. 2923.42, also known as Ohio’s “criminal gang” statute, violates rights guaranteed him under the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BondsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Christopher ArevaloArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. PillarOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Enoch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.