Legal Opinion

Scott v. Stuart

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 24, 1904No. Gen. No. 4,397PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the City Court of Aurora; the Hon. John L. Healy, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers

This is an action of assumpsit in the City Court of Aurora to recover commission as a real estate broker. Upon the trial below, the court directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. Appellee was the owner of two farms in DuPage County, one 110 acres and the other 150 acres. Appellant is a real estate broker and banker. In the latter part of September, 1901, appellee called on appellant and told him if he would sell the 150-acre farm by October 5 he could have a commission of all he could obtain for it over $10,000; appellant undertook to make the sale, and interested…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Monroe v. SnowIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cummings v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. UptonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Wolfenberger v. MadisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. John F. Fleming, Incorporated v. Clarence A. Beutel and American National Bank and Trust Co. Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. Caruthers v. ReesorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. Nudelman v. FishAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API