Legal Opinion

Slocinski v. Radwan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 5, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

1. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove that all three of the defendants circulated reports that he had been guilty of criminal conduct with women and girls in other places. The defendants denied using much of the language attributed to them, but they placed their chief reliance upon the defence of privilege. They claimed that most of the statements which they had made embodied information which had come to them in documentary form from sources which appeared to be reliable; that these statements were addressed in every instance to fellow members of the Holy Cross congregation, and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClapMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Shurtleff v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879
  3. Redgate v. RoushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Chambers v. LeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Kersting v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Pyne v. Jamaica Nutrition Holdings Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Stacy Marie Vincent v. Louis Marx & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Higgs v. BoleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  5. Estate v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API