Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Hammond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. This the trial court has set aside for lack of clarity in the charge. The appeal is from that order. It should be affirmed.

No other question is before us at this time, but as another trial may be had, a discussion of our views on the merits, as the case *337now stands, may be helpful. Plaintiff administrator, who brings this action to recover for the death of his wife, is the father of defendant. The decedent was the mother of defendant. It is alleged she was killed because defendant drove the automobile in which she was riding as a guest in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lahr v. TirrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Sanders v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
  3. Spreen v. McCannNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Mullin v. RiddellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Peters v. B. & F. Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API