Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mullin v. Riddell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1937Published

1DissentMcNamee, J.

TMs record, in so far as I have found, discloses no negligent act nor any negligent omission on the part of the defendant to support the judgment.

Market is one of the most important streets in the city of Amsterdam, and part of it is a very steep hill. On the morning of March 13, 1935, it was coated with ice upon wMch a light snow had fallen. The defendant was proceeding down tMs hill with Ms automobile in second gear. The ear suddenly lurched and sMdded to one side, and continued to sMd, and the defendant applied Ms brakes intermittently and cautiously, usmg the steering devices to keep the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lahr v. TirrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Hammond v. HammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API