Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Sharp

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2003No. APPEAL NO. C-020327PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} The relator, The Cincinnati Enquirer, filed this original action for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents, Tim Sharp, President of the Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority, and David Krings, the Administrator of Hamilton County, to give The Enquirer access to certain documents concerning business plans for the Banks Redevelopment Project. Because we conclude that the documents in question are exempt from disclosure under the public records law — the information has never become a public record — we deny the writ.

I. One Meeting

{¶ 2} The parties…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. The City of Virginia Beach, Virginia Thomas M. Leahy, III v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Robert S. Cooper, Jr. v. The Department of the Navy of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Citizens Against Taxpayer Abuse, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API