Legal Opinion
Donohue v. Corning
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided June 20, 2008No. C.A. 3733-VCSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINE, Vice Chancellor.
Through this motion for partial summary judgment, plaintiff Mark Donohue seeks advancement for this action, which he initiated to determine who is in control of defendant Expansion Capital Partners, LLC. Donohue, who was purportedly removed for cause by a vote of the Non-Managing Members on Expansion’s Board in conformity with Expansion’s LLC Agreement, challenges his removal by alleging that there was no “Cause” as defined in the LLC Agreement. Donohue bases his claim for advancement on an advancement provision in Expansion’s LLC agreement. But I interpret that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Stifel Financial Corp. v. CochranSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
- Hibbert v. Hollywood Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- NAMA Holdings, LLC v. World Market Center Venture, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kramer v. Liberty Property TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Dore v. Sweports Ltd.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017
- International Rail Partners LLC v. American Rail Partners, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
- Nams Holdings, LLC v. ReeceNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018
- Rushikesh Manche v. MVMT Labs, IncCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026