Legal Opinion

Meyer v. City of Alma

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1928No. 26119PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

The district court issued a mandatory injunction against the defendants to abate what it termed a nuisance in the form of a ditch on the public highway in front of the property of the plaintiffs. Defendants appealed.

The road in question is a part of the public highway and has existed for many years as a highway. It runs east and west on the section.line between sections 28 and 29 on the north and sections 32 and 33 just north of the main part of Alma. A portion of the highway at least was referred to by one witness as Seventh street. For the most part it may be inferred from the evidence that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York City v. PineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Clark v. Cambridge & Arapahoe Irrigation & Improvement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Fremont Ferry & Bridge Co. v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  5. City of Chadron v. CardNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zarybnicky v. County of GageNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Regouby v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. ConAgra, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Narragansett Electric Lighting Co. v. SabreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1930
  5. Wookey v. City of AlmaNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API